Animal Welfare Beats Freedom of Religion
The ECtHR judgment in the case of Executief van de Moslims van België and Others v. Belgium, 16760/22 and others, 13 February 2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60935/mrm2024.29.1.6Keywords:
freedom of religion, animal welfare, protection of morals, living instrument, margin of appreciation, proportionality, “procedural turn”, deferenceAbstract
The judgment under review privileges animal welfare over freedom of religion. It revives the dubious theory of the "choice of society", shows unappropriate deference to national bodies and, for the first time and in deviation from extant case-law, applies the "living instrument" doctrine to restrict Convention rights without even finding a European consensus on this application. It also neglects the question of the appropriateness of the interference (restriction).
Downloads
Published
2024-06-12
Issue
Section
Case discussions
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Theodor Schilling
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.